Honeymoon murder suspect Shrien Dewani has lost a High Court bid to block his extradition to South Africa until he is fit to stand trial.
A panel of three judges, headed by Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas, ruled that it would not be ''unjust and oppressive'' to extradite him if an undertaking was given by the South African government relating to how long he would be kept in the country without trial.
The court heard earlier that the government indicated it was willing to give that undertaking.
Dewani, from Bristol, has been fighting removal from the UK to face proceedings over wife Anni's death until he has recovered from mental health problems, including depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.
Dewani, who is compulsorily detained in hospital under the Mental Health Act, is accused of ordering the killing of his new wife Anni, 28, who was shot as the couple travelled in a taxi on the outskirts of Cape Town in November 2010.
Related ArticlesAnni Dewani family’s anger at BBC's Panorama
15 Sep 2013Fresh doubts in Dewani honeymoon murder
25 Mar 2012His lawyers have stressed at various hearings that he will be willing to defend himself at trial once he is fit to do so, but they say he is unfit to plead under English law and his ''prognosis is not certain''.
The ruling followed a hearing at the High Court in 2013. Those proceedings took place after an earlier decision that there were outstanding legal issues which needed to be decided.
In July 2013 chief magistrate Howard Riddle ruled at Westminster Magistrates' Court that Dewani should be extradited and rejected his attempt to stay in the UK for further hospital treatment.
He said Dewani was not fit to plead or stand trial at present, but there was evidence that he would receive the care he needed in South Africa.
Judge Riddle originally gave the go-ahead to Dewani's extradition in 2011 but had to reconsider the position after the High Court later allowed an appeal.
The High Court proceedings centred on two legal issues - the first relating to Dewani's status as "an accused person", and the second concerning whether it would be "unjust and oppressive" to extradite him "regardless of the prognosis" of his mental condition.
The judges were asked to decide whether a person who is unfit to plead is "an accused" for the purpose of the Extradition Act 2003 "if he is being extradited in circumstances where he may remain unfit to plead".
They were also asked to rule on whether it was "unjust or oppressive to extradite a person who is agreed at the time of the determination to be unfit, whatever the prognosis".
So far three men have been convicted over Mrs Dewani's death.
South African Xolile Mngeni was convicted of premeditated murder for shooting her. Prosecutors claimed he was a hitman hired by Dewani to kill his wife, which Dewani has consistently denied.
Taxi driver Zola Tongo was jailed for 18 years after he admitted his part in the killing and another accomplice, Mziwamadoda Qwabe, also pleaded guilty to murder and was handed a 25-year prison sentence.
Dewani's family have said that he remains committed to returning to South Africa "when his health would permit a full trial and when appropriate protections are in place for his health and safety".
A lawyer for the South African government said it was "delighted" with the court's ruling and expected it would be able to give the undertaking, but needed 14 days "for final clarification".
Law and OrderNews »UK News »Crime »In Law and Order
View the Original article
